|
||||||
|
Although Michigan voters barred their state from discriminating against or granting preferences to individuals or groups based on race in government employment, contracting, and education, Plymouth-Canton Community Schools in Plymouth, Michigan, is doing exactly that. (Source) This is one of the more bizarre “diversity” stories I’ve read. In a recent column, George Will hints at a link between the academic achievement gap and out-of-wedlock birth rate among blacks. An excerpt (emphasis added): Earlier this year, the Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF) filed suit against the Philadelphia School District, alleging “deliberate and discriminatory indifference” after groups of mostly blacks students at South Philadelphia High School (designated “persistently dangerous”) beat up students of Asian descent. I’m surprised there aren’t more articles on the web like this one. The New American Foundation’s Michael Lind, who used to be conservative but converted to liberalism, argues that racial preferences are wrong. The most important part of his article is in bold: The American Civil Rights Foundation (ACRF) has dropped a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) after it dropped a race-based teacher assignment and transfer policy as part of a settlement. (Source) Judah Bellin, a junior at Cornell University, addresses the stigma and academic consequences of racial preferences in the pursuit for skin deep-only diversity. Ann Killenbeck, a professor at the University of Arkansas, offers a fresh perspective on Grutter v. Bollinger, in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the University of Michigan law school’s use of race in admissions was narrowly tailored to further a compelling interest in “obtaining the educational benefits that flow from” a racially diverse student [...] From “Big Gaps In Two Big Gap Studies” at Minding the Campus: |
||||||
|
Copyright © 2010 My Legal Right - All Rights Reserved | ||||||