<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>My Legal Right &#187; American Rights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mylegalright.com/category/american_rights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mylegalright.com</link>
	<description>Read your rights, Know your rights, Practice your rights!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 11:10:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Roger Clegg: What do you think of affirmative action?</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-what-do-you-think-of-affirmative-action/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-what-do-you-think-of-affirmative-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 21:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-what-do-you-think-of-affirmative-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican politicians usually stay away from &#8220;affirmative action.&#8221; If the topic doesn&#8217;t come up in conversation, most don&#8217;t bring it up. If it does come up, they stick to platitudes. I&#8217;m waiting for the Republican who includes racial preferences in his platform, with a campaign promise to abolish this practice in government. The Center for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican politicians usually stay away from &#8220;affirmative action.&#8221; If the topic doesn&#8217;t come up in conversation, most don&#8217;t bring it up. If it does come up, they stick to platitudes. I&#8217;m waiting for the Republican who includes racial preferences in his platform, with a campaign promise to abolish this practice in government. The Center for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-what-do-you-think-of-affirmative-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Roger Clegg on Duke Study</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-on-duke-study/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-on-duke-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-on-duke-study/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Center for Equal Opportunity&#8217;s Roger Clegg has a blog post up at Minding the Campus about the Duke study I blogged about on Monday. His is a great title and sums up the main objection nicely: No Research, Please, Unless It Helps Our Cause The study revealed that white students enter college with higher [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Center for Equal Opportunity&#8217;s Roger Clegg has a blog post up at Minding the Campus about the Duke study I blogged about on Monday. His is a great title and sums up the main objection nicely: No Research, Please, Unless It Helps Our Cause The study revealed that white students enter college with higher [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/roger-clegg-on-duke-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Judge Garaufis Biased Against Whites?</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/judge-garaufis-biased-against-whites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/judge-garaufis-biased-against-whites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 13:15:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/judge-garaufis-biased-against-whites/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Attorneys for New York City have asked that Brooklyn federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis be removed from the case that-shall-never-end for bias against white firefighters. Garaufis appointed an independent monitor to oversee FDNY&#8217;s efforts to increase so-called diversity in the department, which the judge called &#8220;a stubborn bastion of white male privilege.&#8221; About four million of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attorneys for New York City have asked that Brooklyn federal Judge Nicholas Garaufis be removed from the case that-shall-never-end for bias against white firefighters. Garaufis appointed an independent monitor to oversee FDNY&#8217;s efforts to increase so-called diversity in the department, which the judge called &#8220;a stubborn bastion of white male privilege.&#8221; About four million of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/judge-garaufis-biased-against-whites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke: Effects of Lowered Admissions Standards</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/duke-effects-of-lowered-admissions-standards/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/duke-effects-of-lowered-admissions-standards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 09:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/duke-effects-of-lowered-admissions-standards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;euphemistically known as &#8220;affirmative action.&#8221; When I first read about &#8220;What Happens After Enrollment: An Analysis of the Time Paths of Racial Difference in GPA and Major Choice (32 pages in PDF),&#8221; by Duke University economists Peter Arcidiacono and Esteban Aucejo and sociologist Ken Spenner, the results seemed intuitive to me. Students admitted with lesser [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;euphemistically known as &#8220;affirmative action.&#8221; When I first read about &#8220;What Happens After Enrollment: An Analysis of the Time Paths of Racial Difference in GPA and Major Choice (32 pages in PDF),&#8221; by Duke University economists Peter Arcidiacono and Esteban Aucejo and sociologist Ken Spenner, the results seemed intuitive to me. Students admitted with lesser [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/duke-effects-of-lowered-admissions-standards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jerry Brown Still Opposes Prop. 209</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/jerry-brown-still-opposes-prop-209/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/jerry-brown-still-opposes-prop-209/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:08:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/jerry-brown-still-opposes-prop-209/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The battle to overturn racial neutrality in California&#8217;s government continues. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that a federal court will consider a challenge to Proposition 209, a voter-approved law that bars the government from granting preferences to or discriminating against individuals or groups based on race in education, employment, and contracting. And Governor Jerry Brown [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The battle to overturn racial neutrality in California&#8217;s government continues. The San Francisco Chronicle reports that a federal court will consider a challenge to Proposition 209, a voter-approved law that bars the government from granting preferences to or discriminating against individuals or groups based on race in education, employment, and contracting. And Governor Jerry Brown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/jerry-brown-still-opposes-prop-209/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lee Bollinger on Fisher v. Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/lee-bollinger-on-fisher-v-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/lee-bollinger-on-fisher-v-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 21:08:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/lee-bollinger-on-fisher-v-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lee Bollinger, former president of the University of Michigan and defendant in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, penned an op-ed for the Washington Post. He still supports racial preferences. (Surprise!) Bollinger quotes a letter George Washington wrote to Alexander Hamilton about points he should have raised in his Farewell Address&#8211;education and the university&#8211;to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee Bollinger, former president of the University of Michigan and defendant in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger, penned an op-ed for the Washington Post. He still supports racial preferences. (Surprise!) Bollinger quotes a letter George Washington wrote to Alexander Hamilton about points he should have raised in his Farewell Address&#8211;education and the university&#8211;to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/lee-bollinger-on-fisher-v-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Richard Kahlenberg on Fisher v. Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/richard-kahlenberg-on-fisher-v-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/richard-kahlenberg-on-fisher-v-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 15:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/richard-kahlenberg-on-fisher-v-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Century Foundation senior fellow Richard Kahlenberg gets to the core issue in Fisher v. Texas, namely, why schools with race-neutral admissions policies that work still resort to racial preferences. From the Chronicle of Higher Education: &#8220;The case, Fisher v. Texas, presents the question of whether an institution of higher education is allowed to use race [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Century Foundation senior fellow Richard Kahlenberg gets to the core issue in Fisher v. Texas, namely, why schools with race-neutral admissions policies that work still resort to racial preferences. From the Chronicle of Higher Education: &#8220;The case, Fisher v. Texas, presents the question of whether an institution of higher education is allowed to use race [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/richard-kahlenberg-on-fisher-v-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colorized America</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/colorized-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/colorized-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/colorized-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One day the current crop of &#8220;affirmative action&#8221; opponents will be no more, which is why I&#8217;m heartened to know there are young people who think deeply about the unfairness of racial preferences and the double standards their existence encourages. Alex Gushner, a senior at the University of California at Santa Barbara, writes in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One day the current crop of &#8220;affirmative action&#8221; opponents will be no more, which is why I&#8217;m heartened to know there are young people who think deeply about the unfairness of racial preferences and the double standards their existence encourages. Alex Gushner, a senior at the University of California at Santa Barbara, writes in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/colorized-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey Supremes, Take the Fisher Case</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/hey-supremes-take-the-fisher-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/hey-supremes-take-the-fisher-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 09:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/hey-supremes-take-the-fisher-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why are some racial preferences opponents eager for the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit racial preferences? I want the court to hear Fisher v. Texas to determine how states have applied eight-year-old Grutter v. Bollinger, the case that allows taxpayer-supported schools to use race as a &#8220;plus&#8221; factor in admissions. Although schools must consider race-neutral [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why are some racial preferences opponents eager for the U.S. Supreme Court to revisit racial preferences? I want the court to hear Fisher v. Texas to determine how states have applied eight-year-old Grutter v. Bollinger, the case that allows taxpayer-supported schools to use race as a &#8220;plus&#8221; factor in admissions. Although schools must consider race-neutral [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/hey-supremes-take-the-fisher-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Larry Purdy on Fisher v. Texas</title>
		<link>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/larry-purdy-on-fisher-v-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/larry-purdy-on-fisher-v-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 06:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MLR</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[American Rights]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/larry-purdy-on-fisher-v-texas/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Larry Purdy was trial counsel for plaintiffs Barbara Grutter and Jennifer Gratz in racial preferences cases Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger. He also wrote a book titled Getting Under the Skin of &#8220;Diversity&#8221;: Searching for the Color-Blind Ideal, in which he offered a rebuttal to The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Larry Purdy was trial counsel for plaintiffs Barbara Grutter and Jennifer Gratz in racial preferences cases Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger. He also wrote a book titled Getting Under the Skin of &#8220;Diversity&#8221;: Searching for the Color-Blind Ideal, in which he offered a rebuttal to The Shape of the River: Long-Term Consequences of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mylegalright.com/american_rights/larry-purdy-on-fisher-v-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

